- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 06:04:18 -0700
- To: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: "Kay, Michael" <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
I think the confusion came from using the term multi-line for the mode where you search in a single line and do not match a newline. Maybe we should call it the per-line mode (vs the string mode). Thanks and best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeni Tennison [mailto:jeni@jenitennison.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:05 AM > To: Michael Rys > Cc: Kay, Michael; public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: MS-FO-LC1-047: 7.5.2 fn:matches > > Hi Michael, > > [regarding errors in the examples of fn:matches()] > > The first one is within a line, but the strings are distributed over > > two lines. > > > > The second one is using the multi-line option, so it should find it, > > but it currently returns true. Etc. > > > > Either the examples are wrong or the description of multiline > > matching is confusing. > > The behaviour for the particular examples is described in 7.5.1 > Regular Expression Syntax, where it says: > > * In string mode, the metacharacter . matches any character > whatsoever. In multiline mode, the metacharacter . matches any > character except a newline (#x0A) character. > > The first example: > > fn:matches(., "Kaum.*krähen") > > is in string mode, so the metacharacter . matches any character > whatsoever, including newline (#x0A) characters. Thus it will return > true despite the fact that "Kaum" and "krähen" appear on different > lines, because the . can match the newline character between them. > > The second example: > > fn:matches(., "Kaum.*krähen", 'm') > > is in multiline mode, so the metacharacter . matches any character > aside from newline (#x0A) characters. Thus it will return false > because "Kaum" and "krähen" have a newline character (which can't be > matched by the .) between them. > > Personally, I think that the spec is clear, but perhaps you have some > suggested wording that would make it clearer? > > Cheers, > > Jeni > > --- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com/ >
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2003 09:04:50 UTC