- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:56:31 -0800
- To: "Oliver Becker" <obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Oliver: Thank you for your comment. It appears that the compatibility appendix was not updated when the definition of the function was changed. We will fix that. All the best, Ashok -----Original Message----- From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Oliver Becker Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 8:06 AM To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: [FO] OB03: 15.3.5 sum / B Compatibility with XPath 1.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-operators/#func-sum http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-operators/#xpath1-compatibility This comment could be regarded as a follow-up to my post http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jun/0113.html Now the situation is the other way around: sum() returns NaN if the value NaN occurs within the sequence (like in XPath1) but appendix B states that NaNs are discarded (this is the definition in the previous version). Regards, Oliver Becker /-------------------------------------------------------------------\ | ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker | | --+-- E-Mail: obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de | | op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker | \-------------------------------------------------------------------/
Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2003 11:57:10 UTC