- From: Priscilla Walmsley <priscilla@walmsley.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:54:38 -0400
- To: "'Ashok Malhotra'" <ashokma@microsoft.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Hi Ashok, I agree that it should be "precedes" and the result will be negative. In the example, $srcval1 follows $srcval2 and it is positive, as expected. But, it looks to me (in the March 21, 2003 internal draft) like the text _is_ correct in subtract-dates and subtract-times, but incorrect in subtract-dateTimes-*. Right? Thanks, Priscilla > -----Original Message----- > From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashokma@microsoft.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 8:41 AM > To: Priscilla Walmsley; public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: RE: F&O subtract-dateTimes* should say precedes, not follows > > > Priscilla: > The subtract-* function subtract the second argument from the first. > So, if the first precedes the second the result is a negative > duration. > The text seems to be correct for dateTimes but incorrect for > subtract-dates and subtract-times. I'll fix that. The example from > subtract-dateTimes-yielding-yearMonthDuration is below. This may have > been fixed in the latest version. > > fn:subtract-dateTimes-yielding-yearMonthDuration(xs:dateTime(" > 2000-10-30 > T11:12:00"), xs:dateTime("1999-11-28T09:00:00")) returns a > xdt:yearMonthDuration value corresponding to 11 months. > > > All the best, Ashok > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Priscilla Walmsley > > Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 5:29 AM > > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > > > > > > The descriptions of > subtract-dateTimes-yielding-yearMonthDuration and > > -dayTimeDuration say: > > > > "If the normalized value of $srcval1 follows in time the normalized > > value of $srcval2, the returned value is a negative duration." > > > > This should say "precedes" rather than "follows", according to the > > example. They would then be consistent with subtract-dates and > > subtract-times as well. > > > > Thanks, > > Priscilla > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 08:54:54 UTC