- From: Priscilla Walmsley <priscilla@walmsley.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:54:38 -0400
- To: "'Ashok Malhotra'" <ashokma@microsoft.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Hi Ashok,
I agree that it should be "precedes" and the result will be negative.
In the example, $srcval1 follows $srcval2 and it is positive, as
expected.
But, it looks to me (in the March 21, 2003 internal draft) like the text
_is_ correct in subtract-dates and subtract-times, but incorrect in
subtract-dateTimes-*.
Right?
Thanks,
Priscilla
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashokma@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 8:41 AM
> To: Priscilla Walmsley; public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: F&O subtract-dateTimes* should say precedes, not follows
>
>
> Priscilla:
> The subtract-* function subtract the second argument from the first.
> So, if the first precedes the second the result is a negative
> duration.
> The text seems to be correct for dateTimes but incorrect for
> subtract-dates and subtract-times. I'll fix that. The example from
> subtract-dateTimes-yielding-yearMonthDuration is below. This may have
> been fixed in the latest version.
>
> fn:subtract-dateTimes-yielding-yearMonthDuration(xs:dateTime("
> 2000-10-30
> T11:12:00"), xs:dateTime("1999-11-28T09:00:00")) returns a
> xdt:yearMonthDuration value corresponding to 11 months.
>
>
> All the best, Ashok
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Priscilla Walmsley
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 5:29 AM
> > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> >
> >
> > The descriptions of
> subtract-dateTimes-yielding-yearMonthDuration and
> > -dayTimeDuration say:
> >
> > "If the normalized value of $srcval1 follows in time the normalized
> > value of $srcval2, the returned value is a negative duration."
> >
> > This should say "precedes" rather than "follows", according to the
> > example. They would then be consistent with subtract-dates and
> > subtract-times as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Priscilla
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 08:54:54 UTC