Re: Highly unfortunate notation

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@us.ibm.com> was heard to say:
| (Ideally, I would suggest that -- given this problem of context -- a less 
| code-like pseudocode be adopted, so the distinction is obvious at a 
| glance. But changing the names to add a PSEUDO- flag would help 
| tremendously!)

I think you're right and I'm trying to figure out what to do about it.
I hope to address this for the next round of publication, but it's
significant enough that I'm reluctant to make that a promise.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | A child becomes an adult when he realizes he
XML Standards Architect | has a right not only to be right but also to
Web Tech. and Standards | be wrong.--Thomas Szasz
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE9vVBDOyltUcwYWjsRAqIsAKCj/UIEepc0kwaJ7+C8A3rCq9gs5QCgiE5g
pvACkk+7AGjzJwvIPcy2uOk=
=S2Q3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Monday, 28 October 2002 14:37:03 UTC