- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:59:11 +0200
- To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com, public-qt-comments@w3.org
We introduced the term "declaration" because "top-level element" was both turgid and technically incorrect. As with other terms (for example, instruction) it's a word that has other meanings in other specifications, and we therefore need to make sure that it's clear from the context. I think the fact that we always hyperlink the first occurrence of the term in any paragraph or section to the definition achieves this goal. Michael Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: Svgdeveloper@aol.com [mailto:Svgdeveloper@aol.com] > Sent: 24 October 2002 20:11 > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: XSLT 2.0 - 3.4 "declaration" > > > > > > > I think the term "declaration" (used without qualification) > is going to cause > difficulties when explaining XSLT 2.0, since we already have > XML declaration, > namespace declaration etc. It seems to me that using the term > "declaration" > without some qualifying term may cause problems. > > I wonder if it would be simpler to use a term such as "top-level XSLT > element" for what I understand to be the meaning of > "declaration". Not so > succinct but probably less ambiguous. > > Andrew Watt >
Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 12:59:21 UTC