RE: [Moderator Action] Re: Canonical representation of date

It's a bug.  I'll fix it.

All the best, Ashok 



-----Original Message-----
From: Jeni Tennison [mailto:jeni@jenitennison.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 6:21 AM
To: Natalie Gordon
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Moderator Action] Re: Canonical representation of date


Hi Natalie,

> I'm assuming then that the examples for 8.6.3 add-timezone-to-date in
the
> F&O specification are wrong, as the example dates aren't even
lexically 
> correct.

Yes, you're correct that the examples in the F&O specification are
wrong, in that the example dates aren't even lexically correct.

I'll try to get that changed.

Thanks,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/

Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2002 10:05:09 UTC