W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > October 2002

Re: [Moderator Action] Re: Canonical representation of date

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:21:14 +0100
Message-ID: <127425704711.20021001142114@jenitennison.com>
To: Natalie Gordon <nfg@decisionsoft.com>
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org

Hi Natalie,

> I'm assuming then that the examples for 8.6.3 add-timezone-to-date in the
> F&O specification are wrong, as the example dates aren't even lexically 
> correct.

Yes, you're correct that the examples in the F&O specification are
wrong, in that the example dates aren't even lexically correct.

I'll try to get that changed.

Thanks,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2002 09:28:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:43 UTC