Re: Syncing charset overrides in detailed/results forms

On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 12:12 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 09:20 +0900, olivier Thereaux wrote:
> > 
> > Most changes look good (arguably, based on a limited knowledge of the 
> > iso-8859* charsets and a bit of web research). I think however that 
> > iso-8859-4 should probably be synced to the "Latin4" name. "Baltic Rim" 
> > being the synonym of latin7 (aka iso-8859-13), it could be confusing. 
> 
> Hm, I wonder what user base does the Latin* names serve, maybe use the
> less formal and human friendlier names (eg. "North European") everywhere
> where available?  For example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8859
> contains a list; I don't know if there's an official one available
> somewhere.

I've applied the trivial cases, attached is another patch containing
some changes to the human friendly names, against current 0_7 branch in
CVS.