W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qa-dev@w3.org > September 2004

Re: [wmvs] Open Issues for 0.7.0

From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:49:57 +0200
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <r02010300-1035-20BB708D0BD511D98FFD0030657B83E8@[]>

Hash: SHA1

Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org> wrote:

>What do you mean by I18N? Do you mean localization of messages,...?
>Or something else?

Well, a facility for l10n of messages — both the standard Validation messages
as well as the UI in general and any Fatal Errors and such — so, yes, I mean
I18N; in the sense that it facilitates L10N.

The real motivation for this isn't actually to achieve L10N, but rather it's a
way to move hard-coded text strings out of the code and into a resource file
somewhere. In terms of my motivation L10N is a nice bonus arising from this
rather than the other way around, but the end result is (intended to be) the

It is _not_ a reference to anything charset related, conneg on Language, or
anything in that vein; those things fall under the category «Core Validation
Issues» as far as I'm concerned.

- -- 
These are the same customers you are referring to whom Microsoft thought
would need MS Bob and the Talking Paperclip?   One thing is to give them
enough rope to hang themselves,  but a boobytrapped thermonuclear weapon
running on a rand(time) countdown... Is that really wise? - Me to MS rep.

Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3

Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2004 13:50:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:54:46 UTC