- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 07:16:44 +0900
- To: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <0EC22825-9FAB-11D8-9F9D-000393A63FC8@w3.org>
On May 7, 2004, at 03:48, Ville Skyttä wrote: > I've fixed some bugs here and there Thanks. I realize I really shouldn't code like I did, especially when so tired :) > but one biggish one remains: we cannot use 'id="foo" > name="foo"' for <p>, <div>, <hX> etc since the Validator claims to be > XHTML 1.0 Strict (== no "name" attribute for those elements). Oops. That's right. Bulk fixed, and I went through most of the documents and output and validated it. Looks good, but still cross-checking. > The only new thing that needs attention now is that a relative URL is > used to point to /source/, instead of the old "hardcoding" of > v.w.o/source/. That's not a good thing for local installations, for > example the tarball links will definitely be broken in those. Should not be a problem if the actual links to the tarballs are absolute and pointing to v.w.o, right? I changed the ones I had forgotten. > I'll work around this in the spec now, and will make an educated guess > where the validator tarballs will be available for download when they > are... (hint, hint :) ... or the other way around. I'll name them after what you named them (and the naming scheme is pretty straightforward) :) -- olivier
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 18:16:56 UTC