- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:05:52 +0200
- To: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Cc: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>, public-qa-dev@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi> wrote: >After this is uploaded to CPAN, I will create also RPMs of it. At that >point, I'll revise the validator installation instructions and the RPM >package, removing checklink from it to avoid conflicts. What do you >think, should we remove the old checklink from the validator CVS tree? Yes. Having a tale copy in CVS is guaranteed to generate more confusion than any other possible resolution. We can put huge pointers in the relevant places to make sure people can find it. - -- We've gotten to the point where a human-readable, human-editable text format for structured data has become a complex nightmare where somebody can safely say "As many threads on xml-dev have shown, text-based processing of XML is hazardous at best" and be perfectly valid in saying it. -- Tom Bradford -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 iQA/AwUBQGbbvqPyPrIkdfXsEQLHwwCfQsB+ZdAtnWliceKY1U+Q6jSVfXkAoPhL ipcLr4kXUzQPTIOLQQiAYEmq =acDT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sunday, 28 March 2004 09:06:17 UTC