- From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:23:41 +0300
- To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: public-qa-dev@w3.org
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 09:53, olivier Thereaux wrote: > '/usr/bin/checklink' and '/usr/bin/checklink -h' gave me respectively > nothing and a chunk of HTML (not a full page). I know, this is not > something anyone will do after reading the doc, but improving this > could be a wishlist item for a future version. Thanks for the feedback. This was such a small change that I implemented it right away, running checklink without arguments now outputs the usage message. It does also introduce an incompatible change, namely -h no more means --html, but --help instead. -H is now an alias for --html. > No blocker, though, and I think we're good for a first release. OK with > early next week? Ok. I re-rolled 3.9.1, with the change above and some other cosmetic ones. CVS is up to date and tagged, and the tarball is again at http://koti.welho.com/vskytta/W3C-LinkChecker-3.9.1.tar.gz. After this is uploaded to CPAN, I will create also RPMs of it. At that point, I'll revise the validator installation instructions and the RPM package, removing checklink from it to avoid conflicts. What do you think, should we remove the old checklink from the validator CVS tree?
Received on Sunday, 28 March 2004 04:23:49 UTC