- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 22:38:10 -0500
- To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>, public-qa-dev@w3.org
At 0:32 +0000 2002-11-23, Nick Kew wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> > I've put up the XML Validator at
> > <URL:http://qa-dev.w3.org:8888/>
very interesting and nice interface
Be careful to the auto validation things. Just to avoid trolls.
http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org:8888/val.so
I don't see any problems, it's nice to have this output. It would be
good to have a detailed explanation of what we get in return, type of
messages, type of errors, DTDs if any etc.
A manual :p
The output seems to come back on one line (maybe it's my terminal which sucks)
if it's the case, maybe a formatted output would be better.
For example
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:r="modxml:validator#0.1"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:val="http://valet.webthing.com/xmlns/validator.rdf#"
xmlns:earl="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/1.0-test#">
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="testcase">
<earl:testCase rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/XML/#"/>
<val:testmode>valid,namespace,schema</val:testmode>
</rdf:Description>
<earl:Assertor rdf:ID="xml-val-svc">
<earl:name>W3C XML Validation Service</earl:name>
<earl:testMode rdf:resource ....
.... etc
if you put Earl as the defaut namespace it will make the syntax a bit
more readable :)
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/1.0-test#"
Great.
If I have forgotten things I will come back.
--
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
http://www.w3.org/QA/
--- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Monday, 25 November 2002 00:02:49 UTC