> On 25 Apr 2017, at 12:47, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > > Le 25/04/2017 à 12:43, Ivan Herman a écrit : >> Daniel, >> >> I have just made an update to the proposed charter text (still in the separate branch[1]): >> >> - separated the rec-track and non-rec-track documents in the list of input documents >> - I have also added a reference to HTML, CSS, and SVG in the list of input documents with some general text on why those documents appear there >> >> Are these o.k. with you? > > > Aaaaaah:) Yes! Much better! Maybe order from REC to > ED? html 5.1 and SVG 1.1 are the only RECs afaict. Yes. And there are two CR-s (ARIA). The CSS snapshot is some sort of an odd man out, because it is itself a series of Recs and CR-s. I reordered the docs by putting the two Recs on top, followed by the CSS snapshot, the ARIA docs and the rest. > Thanks Ivan! Daniel, we have still two pending issues, afaik, see my mail of yesterday: the text surrounding packaging and the last sentence in the scope. Do you have time to try to settle those today? I am concerned that there are others who may have withheld their votes because they want to see what the fate of the formal objections are… Thanks Ivan > > </Daniel> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Publishing@W3C Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 11:16:46 UTC