Re: Re 2: Proposal for charter changes, in view of the formal objections by Vivliostyle & Disruptive Innovation


I have just made an update to the proposed charter text (still in the separate branch[1]):

- separated the rec-track and non-rec-track documents in the list of input documents
- I have also added a reference to HTML, CSS, and SVG in the list of input documents with some general text on why those documents appear there

Are these o.k. with you?



> On 25 Apr 2017, at 11:10, Daniel Glazman <> wrote:
> Le 24/04/2017 à 21:04, Ivan Herman a écrit :
>> Daniel,
>> I have just realized that I may have misunderstood what you said about rec track input documents. Do you mean to separate those documents that are either recs or are on rec-track by another WG from those that are either notes or drafts for notes? If that is what you mean, then I agree that would be helpful and I am happy doing it (tomorrow...)
> Yes, that was exactly my suggestion.
> </Daniel>

Ivan Herman, W3C
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
mobile: +31-641044153

Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 10:44:51 UTC