W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publishingbg@w3.org > April 2017

Re: Re 2: Proposal for charter changes, in view of the formal objections by Vivliostyle & Disruptive Innovation

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:13:15 +0200
Cc: Florian Rivoal <florian@vivliostyle.com>, W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, public-new-work@w3.org
Message-Id: <EE1EF7D0-9B2E-4014-901A-023671352BE2@w3.org>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>

> On 25 Apr 2017, at 11:10, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> 
> Le 24/04/2017 à 21:04, Ivan Herman a écrit :
>> Daniel,
>> 
>> I have just realized that I may have misunderstood what you said about rec track input documents. Do you mean to separate those documents that are either recs or are on rec-track by another WG from those that are either notes or drafts for notes? If that is what you mean, then I agree that would be helpful and I am happy doing it (tomorrow...)
> 
> Yes, that was exactly my suggestion.

Ok, now I understand. I will do it later today; sorry for not having understood before…

Ivan


> 
> </Daniel>
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704





Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 09:13:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 April 2017 09:13:33 UTC