Re: Draft EPUB Survey: Feedback requested

Hi Liisa,

Thanks for the quick reply. I’m in Australia now and will promote it not only at the conference this week, but also next week when I meet with the Australian Publishers Association in Sydney.

Karen


> On 9 Feb 2020, at 14:26, McCloy-Kelley, Liisa <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Karen- 
>  
> The survey should launch publicly later this evening US EST time. We decided Friday that it should go out tonight to start collecting responses from Asia and Europe first thing tomorrow.
>  
> I think we’ve intentionally left the end date open, trying to determine how much response and from whom we get early on and where we need to chase to ensure we have coverage. I expect we’ll leave it out there for a month if not two.
>  
> Definitely go ahead and reference the survey and share the link we send out today in your presentation. Thanks for including it.
>  
> Best, 
>  
> Liisa
>  
> From: Karen Myers <karen@w3.org <mailto:karen@w3.org>>
> Date: Sunday, February 9, 2020 at 2:05 PM
> To: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr <mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>>
> Cc: Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com <mailto:dauwhe@gmail.com>>, W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org <mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
> Subject: Re: Draft EPUB Survey: Feedback requested
> Resent-From: <public-publishing-sc@w3.org <mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
> Resent-Date: Sunday, February 9, 2020 at 2:05 PM
>  
> Hi All, 
>  
> I would like to reference the survey in a talk this week that includes references to EPUB and Accessibility.  Do we know when the survey launches publicly, and for how long will it be up?  I did not see closing dates of survey on the intro page.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Karen 
> 
> 
>> On 6 Feb 2020, at 02:56, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr <mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>> wrote:
>>  
>> Hi Dave,
>>  
>> Even not clickable, I think there should be a TOC at the beginning of the survey as Educators or Governmental and Corporate organizations will probably stop before section 5… Perhaps if they are aware that there is a section for them, will they page to it.
>> It could be only with the high level section titles.
>>  
>> Liisa, this TOC could also be put in the introducing mail.
>>  
>> Besides, IMO, the questionsa are good.
>>  
>> Best,
>> Luc
>>  
>>  
>> De : Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com <mailto:dauwhe@gmail.com>>
>> Date : mercredi 5 février 2020 à 23:20
>> À : W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org <mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
>> Objet : Draft EPUB Survey: Feedback requested
>> Renvoyer - De : <public-publishing-sc@w3.org <mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
>> Renvoyer - Date : mercredi 5 février 2020 à 23:20
>>  
>> Hi PubSteerCoFolks!
>>  
>> We have a draft of the survey ready in SurveyMonkey. You can actually take the survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PT2MMJV <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.surveymonkey.com%2Fr%2FPT2MMJV&data=02%7C01%7Claudrain%40hachette-livre.fr%7C38d649ce6743414f9fbd08d7aa8996df%7Cf881a2c50a89483181b1c7846c49594d%7C0%7C0%7C637165380232965120&sdata=F50F4yRSDISpc%2F07%2BPr1VElvWmHRGW5qvkba9%2FF1Z2E%3D&reserved=0>
>>  
>> I've been working on the survey organization, which is somewhat constrained by what SurveyMonkey allows.
>>  
>> Right now my major concern is about Sections 5 for Educators, and Section 6 for Governmental and Corporate Publications. Many of the questions in these sections may come across as proselytizing. I wonder if we can integrate these sections into the rest of the survey, while also reducing the number of questions (we have 85 right now). We are not focusing on other specific sectors of the industry in the same way, and I have also worked on language to make most of the questions less book-specific (hi Bill!) and perhaps a tiny bit less trade-specific. 
>>  
>> Please provide feedback by email. You can take the survey to see how it feels, but don't put your thoughtful answers in just yet :)
>>  
>> Thanks,
>>  
>> Dave