Re: Meeting on Feb 24: was Next PubSC call, EPBUBCheck dev status

For the purpose of start arranging translated versions in Japanese and Taiwan (if possible, simple Chinese for mainland and Korean as well), please tell me likelihood of the survey content would be similar to what Dave had already provided us with? If so, I will start a prep so that it could be disseminated to Japan/Asia community pretty much simultaneously with the English version. In any event, I would like to be kept updated on the drafts.

Daihei



> On Dec 13, 2019, at 09:30, McCloy-Kelley, Liisa <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com> wrote:
> 
> I think a meeting on the 24th is a good idea and I think that we should plan to pilot the survey by the end of Jan. to our own smaller circles and target the first week of Feb. for an initial English release. That should get us at least a decent sampling of responses by Feb. 24. 
>  
>  
>  
> From: Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com <mailto:avneesh.sg@gmail.com>>
> Date: Friday, December 13, 2019 at 12:08 PM
> To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org <mailto:jeff@w3.org>>, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr <mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>>, 'W3C Publishing Steering Committee' <public-publishing-sc@w3.org <mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>, "Siegman, Tzviya" <tsiegman@wiley.com <mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>>
> Subject: Re: Meeting on Feb 24: was Next PubSC call, EPBUBCheck dev status
> Resent-From: <public-publishing-sc@w3.org <mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
> Resent-Date: Friday, December 13, 2019 at 12:08 PM
>  
>  
> Just a quick note before I go offline for today.
> For having a productive meeting on Feb 24, it would be good to have some responses from survey available.
> Without getting some hint of what the community wants, we may end up going in circles again.
>  
> With regards
> Avneesh
>  
> From: Ivan Herman
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 22:33
> To: Jeff Jaffe ; AUDRAIN LUC ; 'W3C Publishing Steering Committee' ; Siegman, Tzviya 
> Subject: RE: Next PubSC call, EPBUBCheck dev status
>  
> February 24 is a great day for a meeting!
>  
> Ivan
>  
> ---
> Ivan Herman 
> World Wide Web Consortium
> http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
> ORCID: 0000-0003-0782-2704
>  
> On 12 Dec 2019, 17:02 +0100, Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com <mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>>, wrote:
> 
>> Avneesh and I spoke about the possibility of having an SC face to face meeting when he will be in New York for an AB meeting. I could host it at Wiley on 24 February if there is interest.
>> The AB Meeting is at Wiley on 25-27 February.
>>  
>> Tzviya Siegman
>> Information Standards Lead
>> Wiley
>> 201-748-6884
>> tsiegman@wiley.com <mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>
>>  
>> From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org <mailto:jeff@w3.org>>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 9:50 AM
>> To: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr <mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>>; 'W3C Publishing Steering Committee' <public-publishing-sc@w3.org <mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
>> Subject: Re: Next PubSC call, EPBUBCheck dev status
>>  
>> Can we also get an update on the survey for future EPUB features?
>> On 12/12/2019 9:44 AM, AUDRAIN LUC wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>  
>>> For our PubSC call tomorrow, I’d like to bring to your attention the following subject :`
>>>  
>>> validator.idpf.org <http://validator.idpf.org/>
>>> Status
>>> Updated for free by DAISY in January 2019 to EPUBCheck 4.1.1 (not in EPUBCheck revision plan)
>>> Statistics show real usage : more than 4800 unique IPs per month in 2019 (see attached)
>>> DAISY can update it to latest EPUBCheck (4.2.2)
>>>  
>>> Issues
>>> Hosted by DAISY Consortium, It is unreliable and goes down frequently and it consumes a lot of server cycles
>>> If we want to keep it
>>> It should be improved to consume less resources and be more reliable
>>> It should not be on idpf.org <http://idpf.org/> anymore
>>>  
>>> Will be a subject on next PBG call agenda
>>> And questioning its utility will be included in the publishing survey
>>>  
>>> Best,
>>> Luc