> On 1 Sep 2018, at 15:48, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr <mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>> wrote:
>
> Hi Garth,
>
> These questions should be raised within the next PBG calls. I agree it is very important and I associate to this the questions that Liisa raised also for the PBG agenda. I don’t know if they were discussed on last call.
>
> On TPAC attendance for PBG members, how can we know? Ivan, is there a list of TPAC attendees that we could use to compare ?
The results
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2018/results <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2018/results>
are available; at the very end of the page there is a list of the registrants. There are over 400, so it is a bit tedious to compare, though.
>
> On the same lists subjects, shouldn’t we receive a list of IDPF TPI registered from W3C management?
Ralph has them. Copying this to him explicitly to raise his attention:-)
Ivan
>
> Not far from the beach in Guernsey,
> Best,
> Luc
>
> Le 28 août 2018 à 16:18, Garth Conboy <garth@google.com <mailto:garth@google.com>> a écrit :
>
>> Hi Liisa, Luc, and Publishing BG SC Folks,
>>
>> The Web Publishing WG is meeting Monday and Tuesday @ TPAC.
>>
>> We have a tentative agenda item of:
>>
>> Business
>> Group Feedback - grounded in use cases, requirements
>>
>>
>> Tzviya, Ivan and I feel it is very important to have this be a successful working session, to receive and discuss input and desired directions from the BG to the
>> WG.
>>
>>
>> Is there a good understanding of BG attendance at TPAC? How best should this session be promoted with an expectation of substantive feedback?
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Garth
>>
----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>