W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publishing-sc@w3.org > October 2018

Re: IDPF, TPI, PBG members

From: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:22:59 +0000
To: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, "McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>
CC: W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D7E0FC3D.F2D9E%laudrain@hachette-livre.fr>
Hi,

Thank you Ralph, I agree with the perimeter.

For my information, can some of you tell me how the IDPF board will be
contacted and will take that decision?

Best,
Luc



Le 05/10/2018 16:50, ź Ralph Swick ╗ <swick@w3.org> a Úcrit :

>
>
>On 2018-10-05 10:27 AM, McCloy-Kelley, Liisa wrote:
>> Ralph-
>> 
>> Who do you think would need to give the authorization to share that
>>information?
>> 
>> Would it make sense for the IDPF Board to approve that?
>
>I believe that would be sufficient.  I suggest that the Board consider
>limiting the authorization to just the release of the organization name
>and its "in good standing" or "not in good standing" status.
>
>-Ralph
>
>> I don't think there would be objection there.
>> 
>> Liisa
>> 
>> On 10/5/18, 6:52 AM, "Ralph Swick" <swick@w3.org> wrote:
>> 
>>      On 2018-10-05 04:04 AM, AUDRAIN LUC wrote:
>>      > Hi Ralph,
>>      >
>>      > 128 is much less than the 388 in the list I╣ve extracted from
>>the IDPF
>>      > Web site !
>>      > If you still have that file with │good standing▓ members, I╣d
>>rather
>>      > start from it as it would more accurate and less deceptive...
>>      
>>      I'm not certain that I have authorization to share that
>>information.
>>      
>>      -Ralph
>>      
>>      > Thanks
>>      > Luc
>>      >
>>      > Obtenez Outlook pour iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 5:16 PM +0200, "Ralph Swick" <swick@w3.org
>>      > <mailto:swick@w3.org>> wrote:
>>      >
>>      >     On 2018-10-01 02:21 PM, AUDRAIN LUC wrote:
>>      >     > This list should be from annual membership paid.
>>      >     > But I did pick it form the Web site and not from
>>accounting´┐1Ä2
>>      >     > I don´┐1Ä2t know who can still access to the last official
>>members list.
>>      >
>>      >     Only IDPF Members "in good standing" were eligible for the
>>W3C TPI
>>      >     Member program.  "Good standing" was determined by the IDPF
>>treasurer;
>>      >     W3C understood it to be those whose IDPF member fees were
>>not in
>>      >     arrears.  There were 128 such IDPF members.  I received that
>>list,
>>      >     however as the TPI program is ending I see little relevance
>>in reviewing
>>      >     which organizations were "in good standing" with IDPF back
>>at that time.
>>      >
>>      >     > Luc
>>      >     >
>>      >     >
>>      >     > Le 01/10/2018 17:42, ´┐1Ä2 Dave Cramer ´┐1Ä2 a ´┐1Ä2crit : > >>
>>Do we know more about the criteria for inclusion on
>>      >     the IDPF members >> list? Were these current, paid-up
>>members at the
>>      >     time of the merger? >> >> One of them (Funkerz Publishing
>>Research)
>>      >     is actually a service where >> students who don't want to
>>write
>>      >     their papers pay someone else to do >> it :) >> >> On Mon,
>>Oct 1,
>>      >     2018 at 11:27 AM Ivan Herman wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1 Oct
>>2018,
>>      >     at 17:03, AUDRAIN LUC wrote: >>> >>> Hi PBG SC, >>> >>> Here
>>is a
>>      >     collated Excel file form the 3 lists : IDPF, TPI and PBG.
>>>>> >>>
>>      >     Sorry for my ignorance, but could someone bring me light on
>>the >>>
>>      >     differences between TPI and PBG lists ? >>> - Some PBG
>>members are
>>      >     not listed in TPI. >>> Is it because they are W3C full
>>members (the
>>      >     case of Adobe, Hachette, >>> for instance)? >>> >>> >>> Yes
>>or W3C
>>      >     members that joined W3C on a Business Group level. >>> >>>
>>Or they
>>      >     registered to the PBG not through the TPI process? >>> >>>
>>Also some
>>      >     TPI members are not in PBG. >>> They may be in PWG, but most
>>of the
>>      >     are nowhere in our Publsihnig@W3C >>> groups´┐1Ä2 >>> >>> >>>
>>TPI
>>      >     members can join the PWG, so that is not a discriminating
>>factor´┐1Ä2
>>      >      >>> >>> Ivan >>> >>> >>> >>> To be discussed. >>> >>> Luc
>>>>> >>>
>>      >      >>> >>> >>> ---- >>> Ivan Herman, W3C >>> Publishing@W3C
>>Technical
>>      >     Lead >>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>> mobile:
>>      >     +31-641044153 >>> ORCID ID:
>>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>>      >      >>> > >
>>      >
>>      
>>      
>> 
Received on Monday, 8 October 2018 10:23:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 8 October 2018 10:23:27 UTC