- From: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:22:59 +0000
- To: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, "McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>
- CC: W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Hi, Thank you Ralph, I agree with the perimeter. For my information, can some of you tell me how the IDPF board will be contacted and will take that decision? Best, Luc Le 05/10/2018 16:50, « Ralph Swick » <swick@w3.org> a écrit : > > >On 2018-10-05 10:27 AM, McCloy-Kelley, Liisa wrote: >> Ralph- >> >> Who do you think would need to give the authorization to share that >>information? >> >> Would it make sense for the IDPF Board to approve that? > >I believe that would be sufficient. I suggest that the Board consider >limiting the authorization to just the release of the organization name >and its "in good standing" or "not in good standing" status. > >-Ralph > >> I don't think there would be objection there. >> >> Liisa >> >> On 10/5/18, 6:52 AM, "Ralph Swick" <swick@w3.org> wrote: >> >> On 2018-10-05 04:04 AM, AUDRAIN LUC wrote: >> > Hi Ralph, >> > >> > 128 is much less than the 388 in the list I¹ve extracted from >>the IDPF >> > Web site ! >> > If you still have that file with ³good standing² members, I¹d >>rather >> > start from it as it would more accurate and less deceptive... >> >> I'm not certain that I have authorization to share that >>information. >> >> -Ralph >> >> > Thanks >> > Luc >> > >> > Obtenez Outlook pour iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 5:16 PM +0200, "Ralph Swick" <swick@w3.org >> > <mailto:swick@w3.org>> wrote: >> > >> > On 2018-10-01 02:21 PM, AUDRAIN LUC wrote: >> > > This list should be from annual membership paid. >> > > But I did pick it form the Web site and not from >>accountingï¿1Ž2 >> > > I donï¿1Ž2t know who can still access to the last official >>members list. >> > >> > Only IDPF Members "in good standing" were eligible for the >>W3C TPI >> > Member program. "Good standing" was determined by the IDPF >>treasurer; >> > W3C understood it to be those whose IDPF member fees were >>not in >> > arrears. There were 128 such IDPF members. I received that >>list, >> > however as the TPI program is ending I see little relevance >>in reviewing >> > which organizations were "in good standing" with IDPF back >>at that time. >> > >> > > Luc >> > > >> > > >> > > Le 01/10/2018 17:42, ï¿1Ž2 Dave Cramer ï¿1Ž2 a ï¿1Ž2crit : > >> >>Do we know more about the criteria for inclusion on >> > the IDPF members >> list? Were these current, paid-up >>members at the >> > time of the merger? >> >> One of them (Funkerz Publishing >>Research) >> > is actually a service where >> students who don't want to >>write >> > their papers pay someone else to do >> it :) >> >> On Mon, >>Oct 1, >> > 2018 at 11:27 AM Ivan Herman wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1 Oct >>2018, >> > at 17:03, AUDRAIN LUC wrote: >>> >>> Hi PBG SC, >>> >>> Here >>is a >> > collated Excel file form the 3 lists : IDPF, TPI and PBG. >>>>> >>> >> > Sorry for my ignorance, but could someone bring me light on >>the >>> >> > differences between TPI and PBG lists ? >>> - Some PBG >>members are >> > not listed in TPI. >>> Is it because they are W3C full >>members (the >> > case of Adobe, Hachette, >>> for instance)? >>> >>> >>> Yes >>or W3C >> > members that joined W3C on a Business Group level. >>> >>> >>Or they >> > registered to the PBG not through the TPI process? >>> >>> >>Also some >> > TPI members are not in PBG. >>> They may be in PWG, but most >>of the >> > are nowhere in our Publsihnig@W3C >>> groupsï¿1Ž2 >>> >>> >>> >>TPI >> > members can join the PWG, so that is not a discriminating >>factorï¿1Ž2 >> > >>> >>> Ivan >>> >>> >>> >>> To be discussed. >>> >>> Luc >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >>> ---- >>> Ivan Herman, W3C >>> Publishing@W3C >>Technical >> > Lead >>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>> mobile: >> > +31-641044153 >>> ORCID ID: >>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 >> > >>> > > >> > >> >> >>
Received on Monday, 8 October 2018 10:23:26 UTC