W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publishing-sc@w3.org > March 2018

RE: possible regrets for BillM (and Daihei/Junichi?) for Friday's SC call

From: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 07:02:02 -0600
To: "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>, "'Luc Audrain'" <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
Cc: "'Bill McCoy'" <bmccoy@w3.org>, "'W3C Publishing Steering Committee'" <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>, "'Karen L Myers'" <karen@w3.org>
Message-ID: <005001d3c2a7$2383e610$6a8bb230$@montana.com>
Hi,
 
I will try to join the call, but in a meeting and don’t know how long it will run. As soon as I am free I’ll join.
 
Best
George
 
 
From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> 
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 11:47 PM
To: Luc Audrain <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
Cc: Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org>; W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>; Karen L Myers <karen@w3.org>
Subject: Re: possible regrets for BillM (and Daihei/Junichi?) for Friday's SC call
 
If we have time, I would also like to talk for a few minutes on our PR strategy (I copy Karen, because she is the real expert). Especially I think we should use our means to talk about the 3.2 work more publicly…
 
Ivan



On 22 Mar 2018, at 17:26, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr <mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr> > wrote:
 
Hi,
 
Do we have enough to build an agenda for next PBG call ?
*	[EPUB Roadmap]: 72h call for consensus to all PBG members [closed]
*	DPUB Summit in Berlin : more to say ?
*	EPUBCheck funding : any news ?
*	Updating of IDPF website to redirect to more up to date resources where needed : more to say ?
*	Other task force reports[4]:
*	[EXTERNAL_COORD] call for volunteers : any specific call ?
*	[A11Y] Status of ISO standardization for a11y ? Specific call results :
*	Option 1 (PAS): Creating W3C recommendations and then creating ISO/IEC standards via the PAS-submission procedure
*	Option 2 (Normal process): Parallel development between W3C and ISO/IEC: W3C publishes a Community Group Note, and ISO/IEC publishes standards. 
*	Option 3 (Fast-track): Creating National Standards first (possibly after W3C publication) and then creating ISO/IEC standards via the fas-track procedure
*	To be continued.
*	[EPUB_REQS] : nothing new
*	[BEST_PRACTICES] ?
It was also foreseen that a future PBG call would be on a proper time for Asia and Japan. 
Isn’t it the good opportunity then, to share with people of this area what has been already discussed ?
 
Best,
Luc
 
 
De : Bill McCoy < <mailto:bmccoy@w3.org> bmccoy@w3.org>
Société : W3C
Date : jeudi 22 mars 2018 à 01:10
À : 'W3C Publishing Steering Committee' < <mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org> public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Objet : possible regrets for BillM (and Daihei/Junichi?) for Friday's SC call
Renvoyer - De : < <mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org> public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Renvoyer - Date : jeudi 22 mars 2018 à 01:11
 
Hi, 
 
Our Friday PBG SC call (including prep for agenda/announcement of next Tues PBG call) could overlap with end of a late-starting dinner with Japanese publishing stakeholders on Friday night here in Tokyo. Maybe not since I believe the call time (11am ET = UTC 15h) is midnight in Japan but I don’t want to constrain the festivities. More importantly my ability to communicate may be impaired. So I will try to call in but hopefully someone else can lead the charge re: this call and apologies in advance if I don’t make it.
 
--Bill
 

----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
 
Received on Friday, 23 March 2018 13:02:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 23 March 2018 13:02:36 UTC