W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publishing-sc@w3.org > March 2018

Re: [PBG] 20180313 call

From: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:45:21 +0000
To: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
CC: W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D6CD9ABB.DA968%laudrain@hachette-livre.fr>
Hi Makoto,

You ask : "Are we going to discuss the design of EPUB 3.2?"
I believe that the BG should not discuss "the design of EPUB 3.2", it belongs to the CG.
Then I think your document on compatibility is important in the context of CG work on 3.2.

The PBG has to confirm today the resolution of the previous meeting about the principles and rationale of the 3.2 program of work[2].
And this will send a clear message to the CG "to start technical work".

And about the 2 email you sent about standardization, they are very valuable information wrt ISO and W3C standardization processes.
Here again, it may be that the best context to explain them is the CG as the way 3.2 is written will or will not help it to be pushed as an ISO standard…

Best regards,

[2] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r2RbLipc5VY3vUp_iuPak3oaNxI5BF9gJ5s-98qsmEY/edit?ts=5a578c4c#heading=h.izdc9lnn3tf

De : <eb2mmrt@gmail.com<mailto:eb2mmrt@gmail.com>> on behalf of MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp<mailto:eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>>
Date : mardi 13 mars 2018 ŕ 11:30
Ŕ : AUDRAIN LUC AUDRAIN LUC <laudrain@hachette-livre.fr<mailto:laudrain@hachette-livre.fr>>
Cc : MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp<mailto:eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>>
Objet : Re: [PBG] 20180313 call


Is it possible to add my document Strong Backwards-Compatibility and Weak Backwards-Compatibility<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oxFw-zXJ8PN-1QTAurhHsstpy0rD28hGKx6JKhINJm0/edit>
to the agenda?  I hope that this document provides
guidelines on the design of EPUB 3.2.

Are we going to discuss the design of EPUB 3.2?
I thought that the business have already encouraged
the CG to start technical work and is now waiting
for the output of the CG.

Should I explain the two e-mails I sent?

I have more than 15 years of experiences with ISO.  As
the officially-appointed liaison from SC34 to W3C, I can
provide useful information about creating an ISO/IEC
standard for EPUB 3.2.


2018-03-10 12:22 GMT+09:00 AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr<mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>>:
Hi Publishing Business Group folks,

Agenda for Tuesday March 13th Publishing Business Group call, to be held at [0].

Warning : call time is one hour sooner for Europe and Asia!

Please join with EDRLab GoToMeeting[1]  (IRC channel #pbg).


  *   [EPUB Roadmap]: EPUB 3.2 proposal[2] following last call Resolution #1: “The BG should consider the proposal by the CG and express its approval, telling the CG to go ahead”
     *   Any comment on page 1?
     *   Prepared to send a 72h call for consensus to all PBG members
  *   DPUB Summit in Berlin[3]
  *   EPUBCheck funding
  *   Updating of IDPF website to redirect to more up to date resources where needed
  *   Other task force reports[4]:
     *   [EXTERNAL_COORD] call for volunteers
     *   [A11Y] Status of ISO standardization for a11y ?
     *   [EPUB_REQS]

For co-chairs,

[0] https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=PBG+call&iso=20180313T16&p1=1440&ah=1

[1] https://www.w3.org/publishing/groups/publ-wg/Meetings/gotomeetings<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fpublishing%2Fgroups%2Fpubl-wg%2FMeetings%2Fgotomeetings&sa=D&ust=1518205311589000&usg=AFQjCNEHv0-CGUFdPd-zM6lMooWv5-Jk8w>

[2] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r2RbLipc5VY3vUp_iuPak3oaNxI5BF9gJ5s-98qsmEY/edit?ts=5a578c4c#heading=h.izdc9lnn3tf

[3] https://www.w3.org/blog/2018/03/digital-publishing-summit-in-berlin-16th-and-17th-of-may/

[4] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jpw0KA9StAnWZAaIMqnITmdSOchIZeQIvphX5AmAulg/edit


Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2018 14:45:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 March 2018 14:45:54 UTC