- From: Rachel Comerford <rachel.comerford@macmillan.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 15:36:13 -0400
- To: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>
- Cc: "PBG Steering Committee (Public)" <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>, Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>, Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CAESEvMwjv0VB0uof7kCSrr=SdObSNVY4v8PK2ezmVLThWcXHPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Okay - I can review it in full and try to provide more feedback. Unfortunately, we're not members so I wouldn't be able to rep for the US in any of these. Rachel Comerford | Senior Director of Content Standards and Accessibility | T 212.576.9433 *Macmillan Learning* On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 3:34 PM, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > With the DRM, in my vote, I could provide a comment that unprotect EPUB > gets pushed out to distributors and they apply the DRM. I would add that > the publisher themselves are not expected to apply the DRM, but they could > if they were also a distributor. > > > > I still have the problem of participation in these NISO groups, because of > bandwidth. So far, no person from the USA has signed up to work on this > internationally. > > > > > > Best > > George > > > > *From:* Rachel Comerford <rachel.comerford@macmillan.com> > *Sent:* Friday, August 17, 2018 1:15 PM > *To:* George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com> > *Cc:* PBG Steering Committee (Public) <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>; > Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>; Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com> > *Subject:* Re: FW: [NISO sc34ballots] Groups - Ballot reminder: > "ISO/IEC/DTS 23078, Specification of DRM technology for e-book content" > > > > Hey George, > > > re: ISO/IEC/DTS 23078, Specification of DRM technology for e-book content > > > > Apologies, but I'm unfamiliar with the ISO voting process so I'm not sure > what this is raised as a proposal for? Is it to start a working group > around creating a standard or is it for this as a standard itself? > > > > There's an issue, at least in my part of the business, that I see in the > basic proposal. They wrote: > > "However, it will create inconvenience to publishers since they have to > manage multiple versions of > > protected e-book contents to deliver them to different libraries. It will > also cause inconvenience to end users since they also have to install > multiple reading systems for their use." > > > > As a publisher, I don't apply DRM to my own books - we rely on the reading > systems to apply it. This standard would (if I'm reading it properly) > require application from publishers as well as reading systems and I'm > unclear as to its impact on accessibility since DRM'd EPUBs and AT have > traditionally not played well together. > > > > I think I could probably review this whole this this weekend but I'm not > sure of the context of the what the vote actually goes to. > > > > re: PDTS ISO/IEC 22424-1 EPUB Preservation - Part 1 and Part 2 > > > > Archiving! Something we discuss frequently but haven't successfully moved > forward on from what I recall. I'm fairly uninformed when it comes to > archiving needs and methods but I'm sure Tzviya (when she's back from > vacation) will have something to say or someone to point to on that topic. > > > > R > > > Rachel Comerford | Senior Director of Content Standards and Accessibility > | T 212.576.9433 > > *Macmillan Learning* > > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 1:49 PM, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com> > wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > Supporting documents attached. > > > > I have to vote early in the week. I asked Todd Carpenter if Bill Rosenblat > could be working on this, but have not heard back. > > > > Thoughts on how I should vote? > > > > Best > > George > > > > > > *From:* workgroup_mailer@list.niso.org <workgroup_mailer@list.niso.org> *On > Behalf Of *admin@list.niso.org > *Sent:* Thursday, August 16, 2018 6:30 AM > *To:* kerscher@montana.com > *Subject:* [NISO sc34ballots] Groups - Ballot reminder: "ISO/IEC/DTS > 23078, Specification of DRM technology for e-book content" > > > > *Reminder: Please cast your vote on the ballot "ISO/IEC/DTS 23078, > Specification of DRM technology for e-book content" in the "SC34 Ballot > Advisory Group" group.* > *This is your last reminder to vote.* > > *Ballot Title*: ISO/IEC/DTS 23078, Specification of DRM technology for > e-book content > <http://groups.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/sc34ballots/ballot.php?id=878> > ------------------------------ > > > *Question* > Do you approve, disapprove or abstain on this NWIP for ISO/IEC/DTS 23078 > DRM technology for e-book? > > *Closing Date*: Tuesday, 21 August 2018 @ 11:59 pm EDT > > *Description* > The proposed standard provides a specification of the security technology > required to deliver EPUB content for the purpose of submission, storing and > dissemination in libraries and other organizations. This proposed standard > addresses specific technical specifications for encryption, digital > signatures, certificates, and licenses of EPUB contents, as well as usage > scenarios for secure delivery of EPUB contents. The proposed standard uses > internationally proven security technologies and consists of royalty-free > technologies. > > > > If the US votes to approve this as a new project, we are expected to name > AT LEAST ONE EXPERT who will work on this standard's development. If you > would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact > information in your comments, we are now also required to provide > particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert’s > full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one > of the following Stakeholder Categories: > > > > Industry and Commerce > > Government > > Consumers > > Labour > > Academic and Research Bodies > > Standards Application > > Non-governmental Organization (NGO) > > > > Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. > > > > We are also required to provide a justification statement for why we think > this is or is not a worthwhile/useful project (depending on whether we vote > yes or no). Please provide such a statement in the comments for your > Affirmative or Negative vote. Consider whether you think this standard will > be used in the U.S. > > > > In addition to providing justification statement and volunteer to work on > the project, there are two questions to address: > > > > Question 1 > > Do you approve this project being added to the program, disapprove adding > this project or abstain on this NP? > > > > Question 2 > > Please select from one of the following options (note if no option is > selected, the default will be the first option): > > > > Draft document will be registered as new project in the committee program > (stage 20.00) > > Draft document can be registered as a Working Draft (WD - Stage 20.20) > > Draft document can be registered as a Committee Draft (CD - Stage 30.00) > > Draft document can be registered as a Draft International Standard (DIS - > Stage 40.00) > > > > > > > > Your voting options for Question 1 are: > > > > Approve - Comments optional > > Disapprove - Comments required > > Abstain due to lack of consensus - Comments optional > > Abstain due to lack of national expert input - Comments optional > > > > Your voting options for Question 2 are: > > > > Draft document will be registered as new project in the committee program > (stage 20.00) - Comments optional > > Draft document can be registered as a Working Draft (WD - Stage 20.20) - > Comments optional > > Draft document can be registered as a Committee Draft (CD - Stage 30.00) - > Comments optional > > Draft document can be registered as a Draft International Standard (DIS - > Stage 40.00) - Comments optional > > Abstain from voting - Comments optional > > > > > > IMPORTANT COPYRIGHT NOTICE > > Permission is granted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) > to electronically reproduce this working draft International Standard for > purpose of review and comment related to the preparation of the U.S. > position, provided this notice is included. All other right are reserved. > > *Vote > <http://groups.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/sc34ballots/ballot.php?id=878>* > > - *Approve* > - *Disapprove* > - *Abstain due to lack of consensus* > - *Abstain due to lack of national expert input* > - *Draft document will be registered as new project in committee > program (stage 20.00)* > - *Draft document can be registered as a Working Draft (WD - Stage > 20.20)* > - *Draft document can be registered as a Committee Draft (CD - Stage > 30.00)* > - *Draft document can be registered as a Draft International Standard > (DIS - Stage 40.00)* > - *Abstain from voting* > > ------------------------------ > > *Group*: SC34 Ballot Advisory Group > *Date Opened*: Wednesday, 6 June 2018 @ 6:00 am EDT > ------------------------------ > > *Referenced Items* > > [image: Image removed by sender.] > > ISO-IECJTC1-SC34_N2506_NP_TS23078.2.pdf (295K) > > 2018-06-06 > > Download > <http://groups.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/sc34ballots/download.php/19252> > | View Details > <http://groups.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/sc34ballots/document.php?document_id=19252> > > [image: Image removed by sender.] > > DRM Specification for EPUB Content - Overview-02.docx (225K) > > 2018-06-06 > > Download > <http://groups.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/sc34ballots/download.php/19253> > | View Details > <http://groups.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/sc34ballots/document.php?document_id=19253> > > > > >
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: image002.jpg
Received on Friday, 17 August 2018 19:36:58 UTC