Re: Publishing Business Group - Next Steps

+π

(everybody likes pi)

Merry Holidays all!

Best,
   Garth


On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:38 PM, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>
wrote:

> +1 2018 is going to be a fun year!
>
>
>
> Best
>
> George
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Bill Kasdorf [mailto:bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, December 18, 2017 1:30 PM
> *To:* Graham Bell <graham@editeur.org>; Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org>
> *Cc:* W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>;
> Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
> *Subject:* RE: Publishing Business Group - Next Steps
>
>
>
> +1 to both Bill M and Graham.—Bill K
>
>
>
> Bill Kasdorf
>
> VP and Principal Consultant | *Apex CoVantage*
>
> p:
>
> 734-904-6252 <(734)%20904-6252>  m:   734-904-6252 <(734)%20904-6252>
>
> ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786
>
> ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786
> <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Graham Bell [mailto:graham@editeur.org <graham@editeur.org>]
> *Sent:* Monday, December 18, 2017 3:17 PM
> *To:* Bill McCoy
> *Cc:* W3C Publishing Steering Committee; Ivan Herman
> *Subject:* Re: Publishing Business Group - Next Steps
>
>
>
> Agree. Or ‘+1', in the parlance of our times.
>
>
>
> I see the PBG SC as a way of ensuring PBG priorities can be either handed
> off to the other publishing groups when necessary or handled by working
> groups within the BG, with clarity and without any duplication of work.
> This I think would be in line with that.
>
>
>
> Graham
>
>
>
>
>
> Graham Bell
>
> EDItEUR
>
>
>
> On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:46, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear PBG Steering Committee members,
>
>
>
> *Executive summary / call to action: Liisa and Luc are willing to step up
> to serve as PBG co-chairs and (since holiday schedules make a cal of SC or
> full BG this week challenging) if you approve this please respond with +1.
> The plan to recast the Steering Committee as a chairs + task force leads
> coordination group is advancing and we’d like to schedule a first PBG
> meeting early next year to discuss and potentially approve – comments on
> this also solicited.*
>
>
>