W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publishing-sc@w3.org > December 2017

RE: Publishing Business Group - Next Steps

From: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 20:29:46 +0000
To: Graham Bell <graham@editeur.org>, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org>
CC: W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CY1PR0601MB142233C8798CFCF3894CA344DF0E0@CY1PR0601MB1422.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
+1 to both Bill M and Graham.—Bill K

Bill Kasdorf

VP and Principal Consultant | Apex CoVantage

p:

734-904-6252  m:   734-904-6252

ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786

ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en>


From: Graham Bell [mailto:graham@editeur.org]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 3:17 PM
To: Bill McCoy
Cc: W3C Publishing Steering Committee; Ivan Herman
Subject: Re: Publishing Business Group - Next Steps

Agree. Or ‘+1', in the parlance of our times.

I see the PBG SC as a way of ensuring PBG priorities can be either handed off to the other publishing groups when necessary or handled by working groups within the BG, with clarity and without any duplication of work. This I think would be in line with that.

Graham


Graham Bell
EDItEUR


On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:46, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org<mailto:bmccoy@w3.org>> wrote:

Dear PBG Steering Committee members,

Executive summary / call to action: Liisa and Luc are willing to step up to serve as PBG co-chairs and (since holiday schedules make a cal of SC or full BG this week challenging) if you approve this please respond with +1. The plan to recast the Steering Committee as a chairs + task force leads coordination group is advancing and we’d like to schedule a first PBG meeting early next year to discuss and potentially approve – comments on this also solicited.

Received on Monday, 18 December 2017 20:30:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 18 December 2017 20:30:22 UTC