Agree. Or ‘+1', in the parlance of our times. I see the PBG SC as a way of ensuring PBG priorities can be either handed off to the other publishing groups when necessary or handled by working groups within the BG, with clarity and without any duplication of work. This I think would be in line with that. Graham Graham Bell EDItEUR On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:46, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org<mailto:bmccoy@w3.org>> wrote: Dear PBG Steering Committee members, Executive summary / call to action: Liisa and Luc are willing to step up to serve as PBG co-chairs and (since holiday schedules make a cal of SC or full BG this week challenging) if you approve this please respond with +1. The plan to recast the Steering Committee as a chairs + task force leads coordination group is advancing and we’d like to schedule a first PBG meeting early next year to discuss and potentially approve – comments on this also solicited.
Received on Monday, 18 December 2017 20:17:13 UTC