W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publ-wg@w3.org > February 2018

Re: A followup/writeup on our Monday discussions (was Re: Continuing discussion on Polyfills)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 15:46:02 +0100
Cc: Jiminy <jiminy@chapalpanoz.com>, Luc Audrain <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>, W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D76111C8-3F13-47C6-A73E-CC992402171F@w3.org>
To: Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com>

> On 7 Feb 2018, at 15:35, Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com <mailto:rdeltour@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> On 7 Feb 2018, at 14:37, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:
>> The term "WP Script", in my mind, is just a name I use to designate a script whose goal is to implement a minimal viable publication mode. And to differentiate it from another script that may do some publication specific interaction like visualizing some research data.
> My understanding is that such a beast can be called "speculative polyfill". But I may be wrong :-)

I could use the term "reading system script", but that would lead to bigger wars! :-)

Again, an idea for a better term, that does not necessarily prescribes that this a polyfill, would be welcome


> Romain.

Ivan Herman, W3C
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>

Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2018 14:46:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:52:21 UTC