FWIW -- +1 to Luc's of nine responses earlier (no fair he's probably starting on Paris time). Best, Garth On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com> wrote: > A synthesis with bullet points w/b good. And I believe it's OK if some > points are still open questions, to be further examined during the > technical discussions. > > Romain. > > > On 26 Jul 2017, at 15:49, Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org> > wrote: > > I would propose we let our beloved chairs propose a synthesis of the new > thoughts expressed in this thread and an updated short definition, so that > we can restart technical discussions on a common base. > > Cordialement, > Laurent > > Le 26 juil. 2017 à 15:43, Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Sure, going to some technical detail is important, it depends on the depth > to which one should go while defining principles. > Having a common definition is good, but we may not spend too much time on > word smith. > Personally, I would be ok to see a list of bullet points for defining WP. > > With regards > Avneesh > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2017 14:57:40 UTC