A synthesis with bullet points w/b good. And I believe it's OK if some points are still open questions, to be further examined during the technical discussions. Romain. > On 26 Jul 2017, at 15:49, Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org <mailto:laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>> wrote: > > I would propose we let our beloved chairs propose a synthesis of the new thoughts expressed in this thread and an updated short definition, so that we can restart technical discussions on a common base. > > Cordialement, > Laurent > >> Le 26 juil. 2017 à 15:43, Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com <mailto:avneesh.sg@gmail.com>> a écrit : >> >> Sure, going to some technical detail is important, it depends on the depth to which one should go while defining principles. >> Having a common definition is good, but we may not spend too much time on word smith. >> Personally, I would be ok to see a list of bullet points for defining WP. >> >> With regards >> Avneesh >
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2017 14:04:02 UTC