- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:24:13 +0100
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <CF46E534-AC29-4021-886B-4D9C98841E94@w3.org>
For further info: it is (as he says, loosely) based on: http://w3c.github.io/rangefinder/ draft that was part of the Web Annotation WG, but was later abandoned by the group. I think it is more limited than the general approach; it is based on a specific type of search into the text of a document. Richer in semantics than the Text Quote Selector[1] of the Annotation Model insofar as it adds an 'edit distance'. I do not think it touches any other selector types as defined in [1]. I have not seen the fraction ID spec (and I did not install this, I am not a real Chrome user). But, as discussed before, definition of a fraction ID for something like HTML is not something this WG should do… Thanks! Ivan [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#text-quote-selector > On 29 Dec 2017, at 08:42, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > > FWIW, shepazu has released a Chrome extension very similar to what was > discussed and entirely based on URLs. Worth discussing with Doug, IMO. > It's very possible the URL contains some JSON-based data but still > (I have not tested it yet), it shows that a URL-based mechanism is > workable and implementable. > > https://twitter.com/shepazu/status/946469391545364485 > https://twitter.com/shepazu/status/946548282377031681 > > </Daniel> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Publishing@W3C Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Friday, 29 December 2017 08:24:25 UTC