- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:28:37 +0100
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2017 15:28:47 UTC
> On 12 Dec 2017, at 15:48, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > > Le 12/12/2017 à 15:40, Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken a écrit : > >> Thanks for the feedback Daniel, but it is a reference to [1] >> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-states/ > > Sure. But that's a Note. Non-normative and non-binding. And I regret I > did not detect that document earlier to make a vocabulary change happen. > > </Daniel> > Daniel, Actually, our main reference now is the Annotation Model, not the Note: https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/ The note was just a starting point to our previous version of the document. The term 'Selector' is part of the Rec, not a note. We could, of course, try to use aliases of some sort in our spec but, with the current version, this may not be a good solution because we just refer to that document. Anyway… could I ask you to file a GitHub issue on this, so that we could refer to it explicitly from the document proper? This is one of the things we will have to look at post-FPWD. Thanks. Ivan ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Publishing@W3C Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2017 15:28:47 UTC