Re: PWP draft to be discussed on tomorrow's (Dec-11) call from Florian Rivoal on 2017-12-11 (public-publ-wg@w3.org from December 2017)

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:56:20 +0900
To: Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5C03DAA3-96C9-407C-B934-226A4E71A4BB@rivoal.net>

> On Dec 12, 2017, at 0:19, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I've done a quick sweep through the document to look for passive voice uses that we can tie more explicitly to user agent/author, without changing any of the requirements of the specification. 
> 

I am not sure about "without changing any of the requirements". When you go from "There must be a FOO" to "If there is no FOO, the UA must BAR", the BAR part is new, and getting to that is the point of using this type of phrasing.

—Florian

Received on Monday, 11 December 2017 23:56:55 UTC