W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publ-wg@w3.org > December 2017

Re: candidate for FPWD of Locators for Web Publications

From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 23:05:44 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+FkZ9FFWvW9aUieMCsRai794Ce+fhGEmzu3Lhxu87FB7yv1Cw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu>
Cc: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Thank you for the heads-up, I will take a look.

Note to self - in addition to nine issues filed here:
... there are also two issues with the "locators" label filed here:

Regards, Daniel

On 3 December 2017 at 21:51, Timothy Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu> wrote:
> As its editors, Ivan and I feel like the current, 2 December Editor's Draft
> of Locators for Web Publications [1] is ready to be considered by the
> Working Group as the source version for our First Public Working Draft
> (FPWD) of this specification.  While clearly not finished yet (there are
> currently 9 open issues to be dealt with after FPWD, with more to come), we
> do believe this draft has reached a maturity that it can profitably be
> shared widely with other groups for the purpose of getting feedback,
> constructive criticism, etc. Please take a look at the document and see if
> you agree. The most recent updates were to make changes to Section 4.10
> (Embedded Resource Selector) and to delete the separate section on fragment
> identifiers (as discussed in our call on 27 Nov). An affirmative vote by the
> Working Group is required to move this version forward as a FPWD. If there
> are issues with this version that you feel need to be addressed before we
> move Locators to FPWD, please speak up.
> [1] - https://w3c.github.io/publ-loc/
> Thanks,
> Tim Cole
Received on Sunday, 3 December 2017 23:06:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:52:18 UTC