2017-08-04 0:19 GMT+09:00 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>:
>
>
> For the time being we are talking about WP-s and not PWP-s (ie, packaging
> is not yet discussed). WP-s, clearly must be first class citizens on the
> Web. PWP-s probably, but how packaged are handled may be a different issue.
>
I am talking about secondary resources within PWPs. I would like them to
be first
class citizens of the web. This allows use of fragment identifiers,
annotations, etc.
>
> If this is accepted as a desideratum, we will then have to provide a
> mechanism.
> I think that a new URL scheme for PWP is a candidate of such a mechanism.
> Thus, I do not want to shut the door for such a URL scheme.
>
>
> I am not sure I understand how a new URL scheme comes into the picture. I
> actually do not even understand what you mean by a new URL scheme:
>
> - Does it mean that we would have publ://aaa.bbb.ccc ? Ie, we would have
> to define a new protocol instead of HTTP?
>
Yes. This is orthogonal to locator-independent URLs.
But I do not want to discuss such a scheme now. I would like to know
if secondary resources in PWPs should become first-class citizens of
the Web. I think that this is crucial for the smooth transition between
PWPs and WPs.
Regards,
Makoto