Oops. I made a big mistake. Let me try again. I am talking about both primary and secondary resources within PWPs. I would like them to be first class citizens of the web. This allows use of fragment identifiers, annotations, etc, and thus provides smooth transition between PWPs and WPs. Regards, Makoto 2017-08-04 5:55 GMT+09:00 MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>: > > > 2017-08-04 0:19 GMT+09:00 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>: > >> >> >> For the time being we are talking about WP-s and not PWP-s (ie, packaging >> is not yet discussed). WP-s, clearly must be first class citizens on the >> Web. PWP-s probably, but how packaged are handled may be a different issue. >> > > I am talking about secondary resources within PWPs. I would like them to > be first > class citizens of the web. This allows use of fragment identifiers, > annotations, etc. > > >> >> If this is accepted as a desideratum, we will then have to provide a >> mechanism. >> I think that a new URL scheme for PWP is a candidate of such a mechanism. >> Thus, I do not want to shut the door for such a URL scheme. >> >> >> I am not sure I understand how a new URL scheme comes into the picture. I >> actually do not even understand what you mean by a new URL scheme: >> >> - Does it mean that we would have publ://aaa.bbb.ccc ? Ie, we would have >> to define a new protocol instead of HTTP? >> > > > Yes. This is orthogonal to locator-independent URLs. > > But I do not want to discuss such a scheme now. I would like to know > if secondary resources in PWPs should become first-class citizens of > the Web. I think that this is crucial for the smooth transition between > PWPs and WPs. > > Regards, > Makoto > -- Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake Makoto
Received on Thursday, 3 August 2017 21:10:34 UTC