RE: prov-dm normative sections (ISSUE-495)

+1 from me too

Dr Simon Miles
Senior Lecturer, Department of Informatics
Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
+44 (0)20 7848 1166

Electronically querying for the provenance of entities:
http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/61/
________________________________________
From: pgroth@gmail.com [pgroth@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paul Groth [p.t.groth@vu.nl]
Sent: 26 September 2012 16:12
To: Luc Moreau
Cc: W3C provenance WG
Subject: Re: prov-dm normative sections (ISSUE-495)

+1

Paul

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> In his review of prov-dm (ISSUE-495), Ivan asked which sections were
> normative.
> I propose to introduce the following section
>
> 1.1 Compliance with this document.
>
> For the purpose of compliance, the normative sections of this document
> are sections 2 and 5, and appendix A.  Information in tables is
> normative if it appears in a normative section. UML diagrams (figure 1,
> 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) are informative. Text in boxes labeled "Example"
> is informative.
>
> Do we have support for this?
>
> Luc
>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>
>



--
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
  Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam

Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 15:33:30 UTC