- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:12:26 +0200
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1 Paul On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > > Dear all, > > In his review of prov-dm (ISSUE-495), Ivan asked which sections were > normative. > I propose to introduce the following section > > 1.1 Compliance with this document. > > For the purpose of compliance, the normative sections of this document > are sections 2 and 5, and appendix A. Information in tables is > normative if it appears in a normative section. UML diagrams (figure 1, > 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) are informative. Text in boxes labeled "Example" > is informative. > > Do we have support for this? > > Luc > > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science - The Network Institute VU University Amsterdam
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 15:12:53 UTC