Re: PROV-ISSUE-497: prov-dm: Data Model Figure 1 [prov-dm]

Hi Luc,
I think that it is fine as it is, given the fact that the table is just
under the figure.
Best,
Daniel

2012/9/25 Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

>
> Hi all,
>
> I am seeking the group's view on this issue.
>
> Figure 1 http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#**prov-core-structures<http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#prov-core-structures>uses labels "WasGeneratedBy, ...
> for edges (corresponding to prov:wasGeneratedBy in prov-o or
> wasGeneratedBy in prov-n).
>
> Table 2 http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#**overview-types-and-relations<http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#overview-types-and-relations>maps concepts Generation, ...
> to names.
>
> The reviewer suggest that concepts names are put next to relation names in
> Figure 1.
>
> I fear this may clutter the diagram.  However, if the group is happy with
> this, I will implement it.
>
> Can you express your views?
>
> Regards,
> Luc
>
>
> On 10/09/2012 09:30, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
>> PROV-ISSUE-497: prov-dm: Data Model Figure 1 [prov-dm]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**track/issues/497<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/497>
>>
>> Raised by: Luc Moreau
>> On product: prov-dm
>>
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**wiki/LC_Feedback#Data_Model_**Figure_1<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/LC_Feedback#Data_Model_Figure_1>
>>
>> ISSUE-463
>>
>> Since the following sections are organized by "PROV concept" (e.g.,
>> Generation), it would help the reader if those terms were included in the
>> relationship labels along with the names (e.g., wasGeneratedBy).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~**lavm<http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm>
>
>
>
>