- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:16:17 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
it seems to me the two items are so close together in the doc that one can just put them side by side and that's it. If you want to reuse the diagram, then grab the table as well :-) -Paolo On 9/25/12 3:04 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am seeking the group's view on this issue. > > Figure 1 http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#prov-core-structures uses labels "WasGeneratedBy, ... > for edges (corresponding to prov:wasGeneratedBy in prov-o or wasGeneratedBy in prov-n). > > Table 2 http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#overview-types-and-relations maps concepts Generation, ... > to names. > > The reviewer suggest that concepts names are put next to relation names in Figure 1. > > I fear this may clutter the diagram. However, if the group is happy with this, I will implement it. > > Can you express your views? > > Regards, > Luc > > On 10/09/2012 09:30, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-497: prov-dm: Data Model Figure 1 [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/497 >> >> Raised by: Luc Moreau >> On product: prov-dm >> >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/LC_Feedback#Data_Model_Figure_1 >> >> ISSUE-463 >> >> Since the following sections are organized by "PROV concept" (e.g., Generation), it would help the reader if those terms were >> included in the relationship labels along with the names (e.g., wasGeneratedBy). >> >> >> >> > -- ----------- ~oo~ -------------- Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, UK http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 14:22:58 UTC