Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm]

Luc,

The new component structure looks great, so I closed this issue.

Regards,
Tim

On Mar 23, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> 
> So, we have dropped the term "Relation" (vs "Element") in WD4.
> In WD5, we will have the component structure, which is already in the current
> editor's draft.
> 
> So, I propose to close this issue.
> Regards,
> Luc
> 
> On 02/06/2012 09:01 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/237
>> 
>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>> On product: prov-dm
>> 
>> I propose to rename "Relation" in PROV-DM to "Involvement" because "Relation" is too broad and a provenance interchange should limit itself to how agents, activities, and entities were involved with one another as the lead to some result.
>> 
>> Relations other than involvements should be out of scope for provenance interchange (and seem to be already be handled with the attribute-values).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   
> 
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
> 
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 15:21:56 UTC