- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:15:37 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim, So, we have dropped the term "Relation" (vs "Element") in WD4. In WD5, we will have the component structure, which is already in the current editor's draft. So, I propose to close this issue. Regards, Luc On 02/06/2012 09:01 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/237 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: prov-dm > > I propose to rename "Relation" in PROV-DM to "Involvement" because "Relation" is too broad and a provenance interchange should limit itself to how agents, activities, and entities were involved with one another as the lead to some result. > > Relations other than involvements should be out of scope for provenance interchange (and seem to be already be handled with the attribute-values). > > Thanks, > Tim > > > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 15:16:14 UTC