W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-236 (TLebo): rendered provenance is a thing in the world [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:42:36 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|3f7517a4248af39c99f19159b6b9f6efo2MDgd08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F6C7DCC.3000909@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim,

This sentence has been removed. I suggest to close this issue, unless 
you suggest otherwise.


On 02/06/2012 08:53 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-236 (TLebo): rendered provenance is a thing in the world [prov-dm]
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/236
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: prov-dm
> I have concerns about the phrasing of the following:
> "In this example, the attribute-value pairs do not constitute a representation of something in the world; they are just used to help render provenance."
> I would argue that the rendered provenance glyph on the screen _is_ a thing in the world and that the properties "[ex:color="blue", ex:screenX=20, ex:screenY=30]" are describing _that_ instead of the entity.
> I suggest rephrasing it to something like:
> "In this example, the attribute-value pairs are not part of the entity's characterization within this assertion. Instead, the attribute-value pairs are describing how the characterization has or could be rendered in a user interface."
> Thanks,
> Tim

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 13:43:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:10 UTC