- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:37:36 -0500
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Luc, Paulo, I'm not sure where to check that this suggestion made it to the latest drafts. Did it? Thanks, Tim On Feb 7, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Khalid Belhajjame wrote: > On 06/02/2012 20:53, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-236 (TLebo): rendered provenance is a thing in the world [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/236 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: prov-dm >> >> I have concerns about the phrasing of the following: >> >> "In this example, the attribute-value pairs do not constitute a representation of something in the world; they are just used to help render provenance." >> >> I would argue that the rendered provenance glyph on the screen _is_ a thing in the world and that the properties "[ex:color="blue", ex:screenX=20, ex:screenY=30]" are describing _that_ instead of the entity. >> >> I suggest rephrasing it to something like: >> >> "In this example, the attribute-value pairs are not part of the entity's characterization within this assertion. Instead, the attribute-value pairs are describing how the characterization has or could be rendered in a user interface." > +1 > Yes, this seems to be less confusing. > khalid >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Sunday, 4 March 2012 01:38:05 UTC