- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:37:44 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Message-ID: <CAExK0DfGgR1zZcwhT4RKkqDQq-7Tb=8iVeCNPFDp-OTQK5ePbA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Luc, > Dear prov-o team, > > In my review, I focused on a subset usage, derivation, generation, and > association > > I raised a few issues: > > - (ISSUE-253) http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/253 > some properties (e.g. activity, entity, adoptedPlan) of involvements > need to made functional > > - (ISSUE-253) http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/253 > the domain of hadTemporalExtent is broader than in prov-dm > > - (ISSUE-262) http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/262 > the ontology seems to allow an entity to be used (with qualified > usage) by another entity. > > - (ISSUE-263) http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/263 > Involvements such as usage can be shared by multiple activities. > > Furthermore, the ontology allows for instances of involvements to be > expressed, without > specifying its subclass (Usage, Generation, etc). This is not aligned > with the data model. > > I'll raise this as a separate issue. My opinion is that we should add an note in the documentation explaining that the "Involvement" class is for creating a structured hierarchy, and that should not be used directly. If some one wants to extend the model, it should extend the subclasses instead. > > Choice of name: I understand 'hadTemporalExtent' as 'had a duration'. > But Usage and Generation, > for instance, have got instantaneous time. I don't understand why > xsd:dateTime is not directly associated > by means of a data property. > > Now "InstantaneousEvent" is atTime dateTime. "atTime" is a data property. Given that everything is raised separately or has been addressed, can we close issue 306? Thanks, Daniel > > Regards, > Luc > > 2012/3/5 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> > PROV-ISSUE-306 (TLebo): PROV-O OWL review (5/6) Luc [Ontology] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/306 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: Ontology > > > http://www.w3.org/mid/EMEW3|d505635e75ac02f386bea5657febc725o1M9U208L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F460718.5030205@ecs.soton.ac.uk > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#WG_feedback_Feb_2012 > > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.02.23#PROV-O_Ontology:_Reviewer_feedback > > > >
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2012 00:38:13 UTC