Re: PROV-ISSUE-304 (TLebo): PROV-O OWL review (1/6) Simon [Ontology]

Hi Simon,

> Hello PROV-O team,
>
> Here's my quick review of the PROV-O ontology, as requested last telecon.
>
> In general, it seems fine.
>
> It seems odd that hadLocation has a domain of owl:Thing. So what is
> it's connection to provenance?
>
> Location is a place holder for the final user to use whatever location
they want to choose. We didn't want
to fix a domain within the prov-o ontology, because final users may use it
to referr to non provenance resources.
The connection to provenance is that it allows us to express that something
prov:hadLocation prov:Location.
(I don't know if I'm making myself clear :( )

>
> What does it mean that hasAnnotation does not have a specified domain
> (my ignorance of RDFS)? If it means that it applies to anything, then
> what is the distinction between using hasAnnotation and just giving an
> arbitrary non-prov RDF statement? What is its connection to
> provenance?
>
> I'm not completely sure here, so I'll raise a separate issue. My
impression is that the domain should
be the union of the Involvements + Entities + Activities, but Union is not
supported in OWL -RL.

>
> The old W3C 2006 Time namespace is still used/included. Is use of this
> ontology to be removed in the next revision?
>
> This has been removed from the current version.

>
> I notice that comments (at least for adoptedPlan) still refer to
> ProcessExecution.
>
> This has been fixed.

>
> Thanks,
> Simon
>
> Given that all your concerns have been addressed (or raised as a separate
issue), can we close this issue?
Thanks,
Daniel

2012/3/5 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>

> PROV-ISSUE-304 (TLebo): PROV-O OWL review (1/6) Simon  [Ontology]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/304
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: Ontology
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKc1nHfhd-OmVbNw185miWGYv=HiUXhtyqb5_KX462YpphzJBw@mail.gmail.com
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#WG_feedback_Feb_2012
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.02.23#PROV-O_Ontology:_Reviewer_feedback
>
>
>
>