- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:26:23 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 19:26:52 UTC
Hi Tim, after the latest changes to the DM, does this issue still hold? Thanks, Daniel 2011/11/21 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> > > PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's "type" and > "subtype" [Ontology] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/159 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: Ontology > > The DM mentions "type" and "subtype". Should/Does the PROV-O HTML > explicitly state that these should be interpreted as rdf:type and > rdfs:subClassOf? > > This is a follow up from http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/144 > > Thanks, > Tim > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 19:26:52 UTC