- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:37:42 -0500
- To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Message-Id: <D6356227-87D7-401C-88C3-4115B70BA120@rpi.edu>
Thanks for your review, Daniel. It will certainly help us along. Regards, Tim On Mar 6, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote: > Hi Tim, > According to what you requested, I have tested all the tools I found for > creating html from owl automatically, and I have summarized them here: > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Generating_HTML_documentation_of_OWL#PROV-O_Views_in_the_previous_tools > > What worked: Parrot, Owldoc, LODE, jOWL. LODE and jOWL provide cool stuff that we could reuse for the properties. > What didn't work properly: ontologyBrowser (it is not currently reading any ontology) and ontospec (I managed to load > succesfully the ontology, but it generates an empty html. Also, there is barely any documentation on this one. > What I didn't manage to run: specgen. > > I hope this helps, I think we have enough to get started. > Best, > Daniel > > 2012/3/6 Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> > Tim, > this looks pretty good and quite flexible to introduce new changes. > I will keep trying some of the tools on your notes to see if we can reuse some parts for > showing domain and range of the properties. > > Thanks, > Daniel > > > 2012/3/6 Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk> > > Great work Tim. You managed to make the automation work in no time :-) > > Just a couple of observations. > > - Currently in Section 2 " PROV-O at a glance" will be better in the Introduction, or in Section 3. For example the example can be mentioned in the intro paragraph of Section 3. > - Section 2, should be compact, and will contains mainly the three indexes of the terms in the three parts of the ontology. I notice that such indexes are in Section 3! > - If we go with the option of having one example that is shown mainly in Section 3.1 (Core terms) and Section 3.2 (Qualified relationships), then I think that we will not anymore need the "hide/show examples" button. I didn't discuss this last point with jun, so she may have a different opinion. > > Thanks, khalid > > > On 06/03/2012 02:23, Timothy Lebo wrote: >> >> prov-o, >> >> I have a prototype that shows the essential features that we discussed today in our telecon: >> >> >> 0) Follows the new section organization from Khalid and Jun. >> >> >> 1) Permitting areas for manual editing >> >> This can be done by editing the main body, or a separate file that is included upon page request. >> >> >> 2) Listing classes and properties according to the "three categories" >> >> This is done via SPARQL query into a triple store named graph that caches http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl >> >> >> 3) Including manually-created diagrams. >> >> This is done by traditional HTML. >> >> >> 4) Example hiding >> >> Taken from the previous WD. The input type is odd but can be fixed. >> >> >> 5) Including examples directly from the version controlled examples listed in http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_examples >> >> This is done a priori with a script that fetches the examples to include, which are then included upon page request. >> >> >> >> The prototype can be seen at: >> >> http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o >> >> The code is version controlled at https://github.com/timrdf/prov-lodspeakr/tree/master/components/services/prov-o >> >> >> Suggestions and feedback welcome. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 18:49:26 UTC