http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/787ce8e3531e makes entity disjoint with activity -Tim On Mar 5, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Yes, this seems to be aligned with prov-dm. > > Can you explain me how an axiom like this should be interpreted > if we have accounts/named graph. > > In acc1, > :a a Entity > > in acc2, > :a a Activity > > Is the axiom holding within a given account/named graph, but not necessarily across? > > Thanks, > Luc > > On 05/03/12 13:59, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-291 (TLebo): Entity owl:disjointWith Activity [mapping prov-dm<-> prov-o] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/291 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: mapping prov-dm<-> prov-o >> >> Should: >> >> Entity owl:disjointWith Activity ? >> >> -Tim >> >> >> >> >> > >Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 22:29:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:10 UTC