- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:04:54 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim, Yes, this seems to be aligned with prov-dm. Can you explain me how an axiom like this should be interpreted if we have accounts/named graph. In acc1, :a a Entity in acc2, :a a Activity Is the axiom holding within a given account/named graph, but not necessarily across? Thanks, Luc On 05/03/12 13:59, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-291 (TLebo): Entity owl:disjointWith Activity [mapping prov-dm<-> prov-o] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/291 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: mapping prov-dm<-> prov-o > > Should: > > Entity owl:disjointWith Activity ? > > -Tim > > > > >
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 22:05:23 UTC