- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:04:54 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim,
Yes, this seems to be aligned with prov-dm.
Can you explain me how an axiom like this should be interpreted
if we have accounts/named graph.
In acc1,
:a a Entity
in acc2,
:a a Activity
Is the axiom holding within a given account/named graph, but not
necessarily across?
Thanks,
Luc
On 05/03/12 13:59, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-291 (TLebo): Entity owl:disjointWith Activity [mapping prov-dm<-> prov-o]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/291
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: mapping prov-dm<-> prov-o
>
> Should:
>
> Entity owl:disjointWith Activity ?
>
> -Tim
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 22:05:23 UTC