- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:54:14 -0500
- To: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
On Mar 5, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Khalid Belhajjame wrote: > On 05/03/2012 16:45, Timothy Lebo wrote: >> Khalid, >> >> You mentioned that the section 8 diagram needs improvement. >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Qualifed_Involvements_in_PROV-O#Qualified_Usage >> >> has a diagram that shows the parallel between the unqualified and the qualified. >> Perhaps you could consider a diagram like this. > > That certainly looks much better that what we have in Section 8. One option would be to use one or two diagrams from > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Qualifed_Involvements_in_PROV-O#Qualified_Usage > > for example QualifiedUsage and QualifiedGeneration (The example will help us choose which one, and one diagram illustrating the hierarchy of involvement that we have. I think that makes a lot of sense. Two diagrams to compare the examples, then the full hierarchy to see what else can be said. -Tim
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 16:54:55 UTC