W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: [provo] Proposal for a Structure of the PROVO HTML Document

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:54:14 -0500
Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <48BF53D7-AE17-47B2-A123-16DFAF4D0CF5@rpi.edu>
To: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>

On Mar 5, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Khalid Belhajjame wrote:

> On 05/03/2012 16:45, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>> Khalid,
>> You mentioned that the section 8 diagram needs improvement.
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Qualifed_Involvements_in_PROV-O#Qualified_Usage
>> has a diagram that shows the parallel between the unqualified and the qualified.
>> Perhaps you could consider a diagram like this.
> That certainly looks much better that what we have in Section 8. One option would be to use one or two diagrams from
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Qualifed_Involvements_in_PROV-O#Qualified_Usage
> for example QualifiedUsage and QualifiedGeneration (The example will help us choose which one, and one diagram illustrating the hierarchy of involvement that we have.

I think that makes a lot of sense. Two diagrams to compare the examples, then the full hierarchy to see what else can be said.

Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 16:54:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:10 UTC